Perhaps "-X" could be used for "execute" instead?
Thanks,
Rob
On 15/09/2017 13:15, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 01:40:07PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Also, what is mounted under a mount point is not defined in the
schema, so a tool cannot generate this from the YANG modules.
This sounds broken. Manually edited tree diagrams will be a source of
pain.
I definitely think that "x" is a bit confusing since it both means
"RPC" and also "status deprecated" depending on where it is.
Possibly. "x" for "deprecated" comes from smidump. "x" for "execute"
(rwx) is of course common. So if we should change something it is
probably "x" for "deprecated". But "x" looks better than "d"...
Yep, I am probably guilty for the deprecated 'x'. For obsolete,
smidump creates an 'o', so you have
+--- foo
x--- bar
o--- baz
and I guess I visually liked it (and there was no execute in SNMP
land). I guess I still kind of like this. If I would start from
scratch for YANG, I would probably not use
rw for configuration data
ro for non-configuration data
-x for rpcs and actions
-n for notifications
mp for schema mount points
but rather single letters, e.g.
c for configuration data
s for non-configuration data
r for rpcs and actions
n for notifications
m for schema mount points
but this is a significant change to what we have done so far and
finding agreement on a new notation is likely difficult.
/js
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
