On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I strongly agree with Tom that the current draft is an update to RFC 7950.
> I also strongly disagree with the decision to omit RFC 2119 in a standards
> track document. IMO RFC 2119 terms need to be used in normative text,
> especially when dealing with XPath and YANG compiler behavior.
>
RFC 8174:
o These words can be used as defined here, but using them is not
required. Specifically, normative text does not require the use
of these key words. They are used for clarity and consistency
when that is what's wanted, but a lot of normative text does not
use them and is still normative.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
