Hi all,
The issue I'm raising isn't new to the 'bis' version of RFC7223, but I'm
questioning whether we should consider changing something about it while we're
in there.
The 'enabled' leaf has this in the description:
Changes in this leaf in the intended configuration are
reflected in ifAdminStatus, but if ifAdminStatus is
changed over SNMP, this leaf is not affected.
As an example of "working code", Nokia's SR OS has supported full router
configuration via SNMP for many years. When someone enables an interface via
CLI, that is reflected in ifAdminStatus and vice-versa. i.e. configuration
via two different interfaces (SNMP & CLI) that use different data models, map
rw leafs from the two interfaces/models to the same underlying internal object.
In general, many SNMP rw objects will map to the same underlying internal rw
object as the equivalent rw leaf in a YANG model (for products that actually
support config management via SNMP as well as NETCONF). Changing the
leaf/object via SNMP affects the equivalent leaf/object in NETCONF. Why make
this one a special case ?
I'd propose that we remove that sentence.
Rgds,
Jason
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:25
> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : A YANG Data Model for Interface Management
> Author : Martin Bjorklund
> Filename : draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.txt
> Pages : 47
> Date : 2017-10-15
>
> Abstract:
> This document defines a YANG data model for the management of network
> interfaces. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models
> augment the generic interfaces data model defined in this document.
> The data model includes definitions for configuration and system
> state (status information and counters for the collection of
> statistics). This document obsoletes RFC 7223.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
