The server MAY implement obsoleted nodes or MAY NOT. This may or may
not is not good enough as a contract for the management client. My
problem is that the current solution is just not good enough. IMHO we
need to change it.
Even after semver you can still obsolete the old stuff and provide the
new stuff with a new name, although that might not be the common
practice. Which is a good thing, as I believe it is sometimes better to
correct existing definitions then to replace them.
regards Balazs
On 2017-11-15 16:53, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Exactly. With the current solution, the sever can still implement the
deprecated or obsolete nodes in order to support old clients.
With a MAJOR update in a semver world, it means that the old nodes are
removed (or rather, possibly, that the old nodes have new syntax
and/or semantics).
--
Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
Senior Specialist
Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
