Alex Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed the table in section 3 has been mangled - it has extra
> blank lines, entries in the wrong side of the table, and a missing
> pipe in the bottom right corner.
Thanks, now fixed. The table now looks like this:
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| YANG data node in | IP-MIB object |
| /if:interfaces/if:interface | |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| ipv4 | ipv4InterfaceEnableStatus |
| ipv4/enabled | ipv4InterfaceEnableStatus |
| ipv4/address | ipAddressEntry |
| ipv4/address/ip | ipAddressAddrType |
| | ipAddressAddr |
| ipv4/neighbor | ipNetToPhysicalEntry |
| ipv4/neighbor/ip | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddressType |
| | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddress |
| ipv4/neighbor/link-layer-address | ipNetToPhysicalPhysAddress |
| ipv4/neighbor/origin | ipNetToPhysicalType |
| ipv6 | ipv6InterfaceEnableStatus |
| ipv6/enabled | ipv6InterfaceEnableStatus |
| ipv6/forwarding | ipv6InterfaceForwarding |
| ipv6/address | ipAddressEntry |
| ipv6/address/ip | ipAddressAddrType |
| | ipAddressAddr |
| ipv4/address/origin | ipAddressOrigin |
| ipv6/address/status | ipAddressStatus |
| ipv6/neighbor | ipNetToPhysicalEntry |
| ipv6/neighbor/ip | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddressType |
| | ipNetToPhysicalNetAddress |
| ipv6/neighbor/link-layer-address | ipNetToPhysicalPhysAddress |
| ipv6/neighbor/origin | ipNetToPhysicalType |
| ipv6/neighbor/state | ipNetToPhysicalState |
+----------------------------------+--------------------------------+
YANG Interface Data Nodes and Related IP-MIB Objects
/martin
>
> Apart from that this draft looks good to me.
> ________________________________________
> From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Kent Watsen
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2017 8:29 a.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
>
> All,
>
> This starts a two-week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00.
>
> Please recall that this update's intention is to
> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
> guidelines [1]. Reviewing the diff between the two
> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>
> The working group last call ends on December 12.
> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00.txt
>
> Thank you,
> Netmod Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
