Balazs Lengyel <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2017-12-05 11:04, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > > > > I see your point now. > The server has to evaluate the when-stmts in operational. > > I think that this is probably down to implementation, but I don't > think that this is necessarily required. A server is meant to > conform to 'when' statements in <operational> (e.g. if the system > is in a normal steady state), but they are allowed to be violated, > and I'm not expecting that a server would evaluate them (except > perhaps to discover implementation bugs). Further, if violations > of when statements in <operational> are detected then I don't > think that there is anything that the server can reasonable do. > > > > BALAZS: I always thought that if a when statement's argument was true > but becomes false, all instance data that is set/written according to > the schema nodes affected by the when statement shall be removed by > the server. So IMHO the server can and should do something about a > violated when statement.
Yes. > Actually I would like a list of statements and constraints that MUST > be satisfied in the different data stores. Speaking about syntactic > versus semantic seems fluffy. See RFC 7950, section 8 (esp. 8.1 and 8.2). /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
