Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not sure design decisions of some web clients that provide clumsy > user experience should impact how we write data models. If we need > summary lines, we should properly separate them via > > ext:summary "this does magic, see the description" > > instead of relying on conventions.
I agree. Incidentally, that's what we do (with a vendor specific extension). /martin > > /js > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 01:37:36PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > although detailed descriptions is a good thing, my recent experiences with > > web > > clients for RESTCONF indicate that they can become clumsy and unwieldy in > > such > > user interfaces. I think it would be useful to adopt a convention similar > > to Git > > commit messages: one relatively short summary line followed by an empty > > line, > > and the rest of the description after that. User interfaces could then > > easily > > recognize and use the summary line. > > > > Perhaps 6087bis could include such a recommendation. > > > > Lada > > > > -- > > Ladislav Lhotka > > Head, CZ.NIC Labs > > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
