Kent, On 12/7/2017 3:19 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > All, > > Looking at a few drafts going through last call currently, I notice that they > all define their own "Tree Diagrams" section rather than reference the > tree-diagrams draft: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05#section-1.1.1 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00#section-1.3 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00#section-1.3 > > I realize that the tree-diagrams draft isn't published yet, but my > understanding is that its Last Call is imminent. With that in mind, *should* > these three drafts (and, by extension, all drafts going forward) be updated > to reference the tree-diagrams draft? - or are we currently in a grey area > where it's a "may" until the tree-diagrams draft is published, at which time > it becomes a "must"? I think we're close enough to risk the MISREF state, ie.e., I think the drafts should point to tree diagrams.
Lou (Co-author and co-chair...) > Kent // co-chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
