Hi,

A library per datastore sounds too complicated.
I prefer the proposal that was made at the IETF meeting that had
a 'not-implemented-in' leaf-list and a single module list.

Why is it interesting to have a separate module list for regular modules
and imported modules?
I prefer to keep the conformance leaf and not change the module list.

NMDA needs to be possible to implement with a single schema tree such that
a module
is implemented in all datastores, or a subset of all datastores.  Otherwise
it probably won't
get supported in clients.


Andy



On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> CC-ing NETCONF, where the draft is being worked on.
>
> Kent
>
>
> On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 16:34 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:19:28PM +0100, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes. The default value for yang-library-datastore leaf is
> ds:operational
> > > (the only possible one for the ds:operational datastore). This is
> backward
> > > compatible. If one needs different model for 'running', etc. then a new
> > > datastore identity has to be defined  and set in place of the default
> value.
> > > Then this identity can be used to read the yang-library data with
> > > <get-data>.
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, but I have to ask this: How do I obtain the schema for the
> > datastore (lets call it <running-library>) that reports the schema for
> > <running>? Is there another <running-library-library> datastore? Will
> > the recursion end? Perhaps it does since <running-library-library>
> > might have itself listed as the schema defining datastore. I guess
> > Lada will like these kind of meta and meta-meta datastores.
>
> Not really. Metadata needn't be in datastores.
>
> Lada
>
> >
> > /js
> >
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka
> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.
> ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=
> 5qj6BQUSwqYmkAVeKz5axFV8k3gxYEPSJ5Cp0RSnxrE&s=
> I7fR1GY5lN2hVMkDuvryrhDeRypike3wPeFRrvQI5l8&e=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to