Looks valid to me.
Thanks,
Rob
On 15/12/2017 14:02, Ivory, William wrote:
Hi,
I’m running into a problem where my YANG is being rejected by a
NETCONF client that claims it can’t find the node being augmented.
The YANG snippet below shows the problem which relates specifically to
augmenting a node that is ‘config false’. AFAICT from reading RFC
6020, this is valid YANG, but I would appreciate confirmation from the
experts!
Pyang is quite happy with this.
Thanks,
William
--- sample yang to show problem ---
grouping state-grouping {
container state {
config false;
leaf state-grp-state-leaf {
type string;
}
}
}
container test {
container state-cont {
config false;
leaf state-leaf {
type string;
}
}
}
augment /test/state-cont {
// Augment 'config false' container directly works.
leaf augmented-state-leaf {
type string;
}
}
augment /test {
uses state-grouping {
// Augment here fails - 'state' not found.
augment state {
leaf aug-state-grp-leaf {
type string;
}
}
}
}
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
