On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:53:37PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This version addresses the WGLC comments from Andy and Lou, as > > discussed on the list. > > > > > I have reviewed draft-08. > > The behavior and server capability reporting for the RFC 6241 datastores > should > remain the authoritative conformance mechanism for conventional datastores. > The server YANG library and <hello> advertisement MUST reflect the same > server metadata (for the relevant standard capabilities). > > Sec. 5.1 needs to be clear that the existing :candidate, :writable-running, > and :startup > capabilities still apply, if advertised by the server. Not sure what text > to add. >
There are a lot of things that are not changed at all - does it make sense to cherry pick some of them and say that they did not change? It seems that technically there is no point in doing this. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
