Since this is a 7-line change, I see no harm in it if no-one objects? Mahesh
has the token for rolling in updates discussed just prior to the end of 2017.
Here’s a possible diff:
$ git diff -b
diff --git a/src/yang/ietf-access-control-list.yang
b/src/yang/ietf-access-control-list.yang
index 4d698c9..b1a173f 100644
--- a/src/yang/ietf-access-control-list.yang
+++ b/src/yang/ietf-access-control-list.yang
@@ -402,6 +402,10 @@ module ietf-access-control-list {
/*
* Configuration data nodes
*/
+ grouping access-lists-top {
+ description
+ "Grouping to allow reuse of access lists container elsewhere.";
+
container access-lists {
description
"This is a top level container for Access Control Lists.
@@ -576,6 +580,9 @@ module ietf-access-control-list {
}
}
}
+ }
+ uses access-lists-top;
+
augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {
description
"Augment interfaces to allow ACLs to be associated in either the
Cheers,
Einar
On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:53, Jon Shallow
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi There,
I appreciate that this is late to the table, but is it possible to set up
“access-lists” as a “grouping” in the YANG data model so that “access-lists”
can be included by “uses” in a higher level YANG data model?
I have raised this as issue #22 at https://github.com/netmod-wg/acl-model/issues
Regards
Jon
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
