On 1/8/18 1:53 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm a little confused on the Security Consideration section as it doesn't use
> the latest template, but does specify SSH for NETCONF, so I'm good with that
> part. Will RESTCONF also be used as a transport or is there some reason it
> won't be used for this YANG module?
>
> Here's what I think is the latest template and please let me know if sections
> of it do not apply to this draft and I'll drop the discuss for correcting the
> security considerations section.
the security consideration section of 7277bis is the same as for rfc 7277
the ssh recommendation came from you at the time.
*Comment* (2014-03-21 for -13)
Add a RECOMMEND use of SSH in addition to the MTI to prevent MITM or monitoring
attacks (pervasive or otherwise).
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
