Hi,
I need WG input on this issue. The question is how to handle
'serial-num', 'mfg-name', and 'model-name'. I think they should all
be treated the same. Based on previous WG discussion (see e.g. the
mail thread "draft-ietf-netmod-entity issue #13"), I think they
should all be configurable, but the configured value is only used in
operational state if the system cannot read it from the hardware.
So I suggest the following changes:
OLD:
leaf serial-num {
type string;
config false;
description
"The vendor-specific serial number string for the
component. The preferred value is the serial number
string actually printed on the component itself (if
present).";
reference "RFC 6933: entPhysicalSerialNum";
}
NEW:
leaf serial-num {
type string;
description
"The vendor-specific serial number string for the
component. The preferred value is the serial number
string actually printed on the component itself (if
present).
This leaf can be configured. There are two use cases for
this; as a 'post-it' note if the server cannot determine
this value from the component, or when pre-provisioning a
component.
If the server can determine the serial number from the
component, then that value is always used in operational
state, even if another value has been configured.";
reference "RFC 6933: entPhysicalSerialNum";
}
And corresponding text for 'mfg-name' and 'model-name'.
And also:
OLD:
When the server detects a new hardware component, it
initializes a list entry in the operational state.
If the server does not support configuration of hardware
components, list entries in the operational state are
initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the
implementation.
Otherwise, the following procedure is followed:
1. If there is an entry in the /hardware/component list in
the intended configuration with values for the nodes
'class', 'parent', 'parent-rel-pos' that are equal to
the detected values, then:
1a. If the configured entry has a value for 'mfg-name'
that is equal to the detected value, or if the
'mfg-name' value cannot be detected, then the list
entry in the operational state is initialized with the
configured values for all configured nodes, including
the 'name'.
Otherwise, the list entry in the operational state is
initialized with values for all nodes as detected by
the implementation. The implementation may raise an
alarm that informs about the 'mfg-name' mismatch
condition. How this is done is outside the scope of
this document.
1b. Otherwise (i.e., there is no matching configuration
entry), the list entry in the operational state is
initialized with values for all nodes as detected by
the implementation.
If the /hardware/component list in the intended
configuration is modified, then the system MUST behave as if
it re-initializes itself, and follow the procedure in
(1).";
NEW:
When the server detects a new hardware component, it
initializes a list entry in the operational state.
If the server does not support configuration of hardware
components, list entries in the operational state are
initialized with values for all nodes as detected by the
implementation.
Otherwise, the following procedure is followed:
1. If there is an entry in the /hardware/component list in
the intended configuration with values for the nodes
'class', 'parent', 'parent-rel-pos' that are equal to
the detected values, then the list entry in operational
state is initialized with the configured values,
including the 'name'. The leafs 'serial-num',
'mfg-name', and 'model-name' are treated specially; see
their descriptions for details.
2. Otherwise (i.e., there is no matching configuration
entry), the list entry in the operational state is
initialized with values for all nodes as detected by
the implementation.
If the /hardware/component list in the intended
configuration is modified, then the system MUST behave as if
it re-initializes itself, and follow the procedure in
(1).";
/martin
Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/20/2017 4:00 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks.
Only kept the relevant excerpts.
- Some objects are read-write in RFC6933:
entPhysicalSerialNum
entPhysicalAlias
entPhysicalAssetID
entPhysicalUris
For example, entPhysicalSerialNum being read-write always bothered me.
serial-num is now "config false", which is a good news IMO.
Actually, this was not the intention. In
draft-ietf-netmod-entity-03 this is configurable. I missed this
in the conversion to NMDA.
Ah. So no good news in this case...
In the reverse direction, entPhysicalMfgName is read-only in
RFC6933, while it's "config true" in draft-ietf-netmod-entity
Yes, this was added per request from the WG. See e.g. the
thread "draft-ietf-netmod-entity issue #13".
Sure. It was mainly an observation.
However, I think that what we have now is probably not correct.
I think that all nodes 'serial-num', 'mfg-name', and 'model-name'
should be config true, and the description of list 'component'
updated to reflect that all these tree leafs are handled the same way.
I would like to know what the WG thinks about this.
Talking as a contributor this time.
It seems that inventory management is kind of broken when someone
can change 'serial-num', 'mfg-name', and 'model-name.
They can't really change them. The configured values are only
used (i.e. visible in the operational state) if the device cannot
detect them automatically. I.e., they work as "post-it" notes only.
If I look at, for example, the mfg-name, description, this is not
what it says.
leaf mfg-name {
type string;
description
"The name of the manufacturer of this physical component.
The preferred value is the manufacturer name string
actually printed on the component itself (if present).
Note that comparisons between instances of the model-name,
firmware-rev, software-rev, and the serial-num nodes are
only meaningful amongst component with the same value of
mfg-name.
If the manufacturer name string associated with the
physical component is unknown to the server, then this
node is not instantiated.";
reference "RFC 6933 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6933>:
entPhysicalMfgName";
Regards, Benoit
/martin
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
.
