On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 09:27 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:04:29AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > Lada, > > > Understanding impact of your proposal on the following would be > > > quite helpful: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/ (pub > > > requested) > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/ (pub > > > requested) > > > > In these two drafts, the examples in their appendices have to be updated. > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-l3vpn-yang/ > > > > AFAICT, there is no impact on this draft. > > Ideally data models should be decoupled from the mechanics with which > the (datastore) schema is announced.
Agreed, and that's why the l3vpn draft is unaffected. The LNE and NI drafts demonstrate in the appendices how the entire data model is constructed via schema mount, so this would change. Lada > > /js > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
