On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:52:27AM -0000, t.petch wrote: > > That's what I thought until Benoit said, and Robert agreed, that > > 'In the end, the tree view should be browsed with tooling.' > > i.e. the tree view should be machine readable after which something is > produced for human consumption; not a view I share. >
I think they did not say that the tooling should rely on tree views published in RFCs as input. We should discourage tools to read tree rendings as input; tools should read YANG modules as input. I doubt Benoit's tools read tree views as input. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
