Hi Jia, Thanks for your review. The Appendix D nit has been fixed in the -09 version (the only change).
Thanks, Acee On 1/17/18, 1:50 AM, "Hejia (Jia)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hello, > >I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. >The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related >drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes >on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to >the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, >please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir > >Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it >would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF >Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through >discussion or by updating the draft. > >Document draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt >Reviewer: Jia He >Review Date: 17 January 2018 >IETF LC End Date: 15 January 2018 >Telechat date: 25 January 2018 >Intended Status: Standards Track > >Summary >This document provides an NMDA-compliant version of YANG data model for >routing management. It is very well written and ready for publication. >But I happened to see a small nit in Appendix D just before I finished my >review, see below. > >Comments >None. > >Major Issues: >No major issues found. > >Minor Issues: >No minor issues found. > >Nits: >In Appendix D, the namespace of "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" is written as >"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing-3". "-3" is not >meaningful and needs to be deleted. > > > >Regards, >Jia _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
