On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:25:35AM -0800, joel jaeggli wrote: > > Perhaps I apply a different discount rate on the future particularly > when timelines are involved. e.g. 3 months turns into a year and half > pretty quickly.
I provided a reasoning why 3 months may be feasible, I doubled it since its the IETF. You may apply the factor 6. But note that the last piece of NMDA (the YANG library) is work reasonably well understood with people dedicated to finish the last piece (obviously my very biased view). > I think it's more a question of can we live with publishing the module > now as is? Or can we not live with publishing it now? The question is what we expect implementors to do and how we think about achieving interoperability by publishing two significantly different versions instead of one. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
