Thanks.
It's now verified.
Regards, Benoit.
Hi,
This errata should be applied. It is an obvious typo.
/martin
RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
"The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5237
--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Muly Ilan <[email protected]>
Section: 6.4.1.1
Original Text
-------------
The accessible tree for an action invocation of "reset" on
/a/b[id="1"] with the "when" parameter set to "10" would be:
<a xmlns="urn:example:a">
<b>
<id>1</id>
<reset>
<delay>10</delay>
</reset>
</b>
<b>
<id>2</id>
</b>
</a>
// possibly other top-level nodes here
Corrected Text
--------------
The accessible tree for an action invocation of "reset" on
/a/b[id="1"] with the "delay" parameter set to "10" would be:
<a xmlns="urn:example:a">
<b>
<id>1</id>
<reset>
<delay>10</delay>
</reset>
</b>
<b>
<id>2</id>
</b>
</a>
// possibly other top-level nodes here
Notes
-----
The example action "reset" has an input parameter named "delay" and not a parameter named
"when".
Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
--------------------------------------
Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
Publication Date : August 2016
Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Network Modeling
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
