As co-author, I have read and support both drafts for advancement.
In fact, I think that it is important that we get these drafts (and
YL-bis) completed and standardized quickly, since the YANG models that
IETF is standardizing rely on the NMDA.
Thanks,
Rob
On 30/01/2018 19:33, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
Same here.
/js
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 06:55:32PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
I have read and support both drafts for advancement.
Kent // co-author
===== original message =====
Authors and WG,
We have not received any explicit support for this LC on this email thread. If
you believe these drafts are important and should proceed, please state your
support by responding to this email thread.
Thanks.
On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:39 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]>
wrote:
The authors of draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf and
draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf have posted updates to their drafts, and
believe that the documents are ready for LC.
This starts a 2 week LC on the two drafts that will end on January 31. Please
send your comments on this thread. Comments like “I have reviewed the documents
and believe they are ready for publication”, or “I have concerns about the
document because …” are welcome and useful for the authors.
Authors please indicate whether you are aware of any IPR for either of the
drafts.
Thanks.
Mahesh & Kent
Mahesh & Kent
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netconf&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=chxZG5ZrBnHC_vO0f9kYhGnMwAUeF2ALqnpqjt2FOwI&s=cLxPvaw3wBK8KfUx0ZKNPyqPPhC17Yx-o9SJQ_q4AWE&e=
_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
