Hi, support starting this work. The draft avoids discussion of any useful operations based on tags. Setting and clearing tags is fine, but what about <get-data>? What about NACM rules based on tags? If protocol operations using tags are out of scope, then the draft should say that.
(And don't forget NMDA compliance ;-) Andy On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:47 PM, joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is the start of a **two** week poll on making > draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 a working group document. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 > > This document was most recently discussed at IETF 100. > > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to > see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > This poll ends on February 8. > > Thank you! > > Joel Jaeggli and IETF NETMOD Co-Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
