As and when this comes to a YANG Doctor review, the reviewer might like to note that while there are 28 RFC referenced in the Reference or Description clauses of the YANG modules, 6 do not appear in the either Reference section, namely
RFC826 (Description clause) RFC2464 (Description clause) RFC3989 RFC 4122 (Description clause) RFC4822 RFC7824 Also, the way in which the RFC are referred to in these clauses is inconsistent, e.g. RFC826 [RFC0826] RFC2464 RFC 3315 [RFC3315] I think that RFC826 is correct but YMMV. The 19 that are referenced as Informative References are RFC3319 8.2 RFC3646 8.2 RFC3898 8.2 RFC4075 8.2 RFC4242 8.2 RFC4704 8.2 RFC4833 8.2 RFC5908 8.2 RFC5970 8.2 RFC6334 8.2 RFC6422 8.2 RFC6440 8.2 RFC6784 8.2 RFC6939 8.2 RFC7078 8.2 RFC7083 8.2 RFC7227 8.2 RFC7291 8.2 I am not - and do not want to be -subscribed to the DHCP list. I will look out for this at IETF Last Call but may miss it. Tom Petch _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
