Hello all,
I reviewed draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-09; it seems the draft misses a way to match many entries under the same rule. For example, instead of,


      <rule>
        <name>permit-get-config</name>
        <module-name>ietf-netconf</module-name>
        <rpc-name>get-config</rpc-name>
        <access-operations>exec</access-operations>
        <action>permit</action>
        <comment>
          Permits invocation of the NETCONF 'get-config'.
        </comment>
      </rule>
      <rule>
        <name>permit-get</name>
        <module-name>ietf-netconf</module-name>
        <rpc-name>get</rpc-name>
        <access-operations>exec</access-operations>
        <action>permit</action>
        <comment>
          Permits invocation of the NETCONF 'get'.
        </comment>
      </rule>

It would ease the writing to have a keyword (or a white space, as for 'access-operations') to match many entries at the same time:

      <rule>
        <name>permit-get</name>
        <module-name>ietf-netconf</module-name>
        <rpc-name>get get-config</rpc-name>
        <access-operations>exec</access-operations>
        <action>permit</action>
        <comment>
          Permits invocation of the NETCONF 'get' & 'get-config'.
        </comment>
      </rule>

So, the valid values will become (for 'rpc-name', 'notification-name', and 'path'):

 * A string for one entry
 * A string for more than one entry (a white space separates entries)
 * Or, the catch-all '*'.

How do you see my proposal?

Regards,
Ariel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using EURECOM Webmail: http://webmail.eurecom.fr

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to