Buggers, I thought we caught that tree-diagrams informative/normative thing before.
Regardless, Clyde, please note that I think I was wrong before from the shepherd write-up regarding idnits having a problem: """ == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore' is defined on line 1340, but no explicit reference was found in the text '[I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore] Watsen, K., "YANG Data Model for a "Keys...' This is a bug in idnits, whereby a reference that splits two lines is not found. """ Looking at the XML, it seems that references are not specified correctly. CURRENT: <t>This module imports typedefs from [RFC7223], groupings from [I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore], and [I-D.ietf-netconf-tls-client-server], and it references [RFC5424], [RFC5425], [RFC5426], and [RFC5848] and [Std-1003.1-2008].</t> SHOULD BE: <t>This module imports typedefs from <xref target="RFC7223"/>, groupings from <xref target="I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore"/>, and <xref target="I-D.ietf-netconf-tls-client-server"/>, and it references <xref target="RFC5424"/>, <xref target="RFC5425"/>, <xref target="RFC5426"/>, and <xref target="RFC5848"/> and <xref target="Std-1003.1-2008"/>.</t> Right? And while you're at it, please update the reference to the tree-diagrams draft (-06 is current). Also, missing is an RFC Editor note requesting that the I-D reference to be updated to reflect the assigned RFC number. Please also address these issues when posting -21 to address Benoit's issues. Please post -21 ASAP as Benoit has already placed this draft on the IESG telechat in a couple weeks. Thanks, Kent // shepherd On 2/14/18, 8:18 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise" <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of bcla...@cisco.com<mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: Dear all, - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned. Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. - As mentioned in the writeup, [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] should be an informative reference, not normative. - Editorial: OLD: This draft addresses the common leafs NEW: This document addresses the common leafs Please publish a new version asap. In the mean time, I'm sending this draft to IETF LC. Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod