On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote:

> All,
>
>     The adoption call for this document closed on Feb 8th.
>
> Authors,
>
> Please repost your document with only the 'filename' and date updated as
> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-00. Please discuss on list any comments
> received during the adoption call and then capture the results of the
> discussions in the -01 rev. Finally, I believe the -01 rev should indicate
> that the document updates RFC8040.
>
>
I updated the module name and namespace URI from yang-data-ext to
ietf-yang-data-ext.

(IMO the ietf- prefix should not be used unless and until a YANG module is
accepted as a WG draft).



Thank you,
>
> Lou (and co-chairs)
>
>
>
Andy


> On 1/25/2018 8:26 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the start of a *two* week poll on making
>> draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext a working group document. Please send
>> email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If
>> indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If
>> yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see
>> addressed once the document is a WG document.
>>
>> This poll ends on February 8.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Lou (and Co-chairs)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to