----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Watsen" <kwat...@juniper.net> To: "t.petch" <ie...@btconnect.com>; "NETMOD Working Group" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:06 PM > > > Kent > > > > You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to. > > > > The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams > > should be an Informative Reference. > > > > Therefore, the RFC Editor will not hold publication until an RFC number > > is assigned. > > > > Therefore, a note asking the I-D reference to be updated to reflect the > > assigned RFC number is null - the RFC can be published with the > > reference as an i-d and not as an RFC which is what I expect the RFC > > Editor to do. > > > > QED > > > Except I know that this draft will be stuck in MISREF state and tree-diagrams > will in fact be assigned an RFC number by the time this draft is published.
Kent Corner case:-) You cannot know in general that drafts that appear as Informational References and which are referenced from within a YANG module will be published before the referencing I-D will be and so will have a RFC number which can be inserted by the RFC Editor. Tom Petch > K. > > > > Note that this is not the case of a Normative i-d reference being buried > > in the YANG module and not being.noticed by the RFC Editor; that problem > > I am content with. > > > > > >Tom Petch > > > > > > > > > > > > Please also address these issues when posting -21 to address Benoit's > issues. Please post -21 ASAP as Benoit has already placed this draft on > the IESG telechat in a couple weeks. > > > > Thanks, > > Kent // shepherd > > > > > > On 2/14/18, 8:18 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise" > <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of > bcla...@cisco.com<mailto:bcla...@cisco.com>> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned. > > Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro > > > > The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management > > > > Datastore Architecture defined in > I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. > > > > > > - As mentioned in the writeup, [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] > should be an informative reference, not normative. > > > > - Editorial: > > OLD: > > This draft addresses the common leafs > > NEW: > > This document addresses the common leafs > > > > Please publish a new version asap. > > In the mean time, I'm sending this draft to IETF LC. > > > > Regards, Benoit > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > -------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > email@example.com > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailma n_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI &r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cJ7MVnQVc1hgxpVF7oYiVn6 Rbm-Qf2dDyrfYhL-s9io&s=u0Hn9GkO-B0jUGm1MnIQ4x4AgIZNXHBIaZhTPmt3dC8&e= > > > > > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod