On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:31 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > You do realize that no-one trying to actually deploy and run networks > > > cares about live-discovery of different schema per datastore for the > > > same mount point right? Like 99.999% of the clients know where things > > > are supposed to reside and expect them to be there. > > > > But then why advertise anything at all? We can do a *much* simpler > > solution by just having the mountpoint extension, and nothing else. > > Clients will know what to find anyway. > > > > So it this a possible way out of the current situation? We publish a > trimmed down document that just defines the mount point extension and > we do an update of this document that adds all the details needed to > obtain the schema information?
I would say so. It would be immediately usable for the inline case. Lada > > /js > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
