Hi,

This errata is correct and should be accepted.

I think the actual URI to use is less important, so the proposed URI
is fine.


/martin


RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
> "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5274
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net>
> 
> Section: 7.16.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    A corresponding XML instance example of the complete notification:
> 
>      <notification
>        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0">
>        <eventTime>2008-07-08T00:01:00Z</eventTime>
>        <event xmlns="urn:example:event">
>          <event-class>fault</event-class>
>          <reporting-entity>
>            /ex:interface[ex:name='Ethernet0']
>          </reporting-entity>
>          <severity>major</severity>
>        </event>
>      </notification>
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    A corresponding XML instance example of the complete notification
>    follows.  This example reports an event for an interface from the
>    "example-foo" module defined in Section 13.1.1.
> 
>      <notification
>        xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0">
>        <eventTime>2008-07-08T00:01:00Z</eventTime>
>        <event xmlns="urn:example:event">
>          <event-class>fault</event-class>
>          <reporting-entity xmlns:ex="urn:example:foo">
>            /ex:interface[ex:name='Ethernet0']
>          </reporting-entity>
>          <severity>major</severity>
>        </event>
>      </notification>
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "ex" prefix is not declared.  The "example-foo" module in 13.1.1 is the 
> only module in the draft that matches the given instance-identifier.  An 
> alternative fix would be to use a different module and a matching 
> instance-identifier.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
> Publication Date    : August 2016
> Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to