On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:34:02AM +0000, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: > > I agree but the fact is that some of the BBF models have constructions like > that and we were wondering whether this should not be mentioned in the > guildelines document. Normally a server can't set config true leafs if there > is no default available in the model. That is the reason we reached out to > NETMOD. Your suggestions can work but require adaptation of the current > model. >
I agree that mandatory leafs can be subtle and I agree that this is a great topic for a guidelines document. Perhaps you can draft some concrete text that could be considered to be added to section 4.17. There is text in section 4.19.2 which addresses a similar situation with mandatory augments and perhaps we should have a similar discussion in a new section 4.17.1. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
