Hi all, I also have a question/comment regarding this draft, maybe if it's discussed already.
If there a model A, which I would like to use just part of model A in another model B, what should I do? The draft states that "This document allows mounting of complete data models only. Other specifications may extend this model by defining additional mechanisms such as mounting sub-hierarchies of a module." It seems that the current schema mount doesn't support such usage. Then I'm thinking that using deviation to create a new sub-module A', then mount the sub-module A' in model B. Will it be a possible way out? BR, Amy -----Original Message----- From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 7:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [netmod] Comments on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-09 Hi members, I comment on that draft: * Instead of "it is often necessary that an existing module (or a set of modules) is added to the data model starting at a non-root location", this would read better: "it is often necessary that an existing module (or a set of modules) be added to the data model at locations other than the root." (Section 1) * 'The "mount-point" statement MUST NOT be used in a YANG version 1 module' Why this documents keeps YANG 1 off from its scope? (Section 3.1) * 'Specifically, a server that doesn?t support the NMDA, MAY implement revision 2016-06-21 of "ietf-yang-library" [RFC7950] under a mount point' [RFC7895] defines "ietf-yang-library", not [RFC7950] (Section 6) * Why not "Tree Diagram" instead of "Data Model"? The wording has become a Best Practice (Section 8) * Idem, "This document...has the following diagram" captures better the Best Practice than "This document...has the following structure" (Section 8) * Same remark on restricting to YANG 1.1: "The ?mount-point? statement MUST NOT be used in a YANG version 1 module, neither explicitly nor via a ?uses? statement (description of the extension "mount-point") * Should this sentence refers only to [RFC6020]? "This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC6020]" (Section 10) * The document cites /schema-mounts as "The schema defined by this state data provides detailed information about a server implementation may help an attacker identify the server capabilities and server implementations with known bugs" I think this section should warn also on: ** Section 2.1.2 and 4 of [RFC7895] (the list 'module' contains the leaf 'schema': from which anyone may retrieve a YANG module) ** Section 3 of [RFC6022] (it defines the RPC 'get-schema'; with which anyone may get a YANG module) ** and Section 5 of [RFC8341] (reminding administrators to set user rights accordingly, and giving their defaults values). Regards, Ariel [RFC6020] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6020 [RFC7895] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7895 [RFC7950] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950 [RFC8341] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8341 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using EURECOM Webmail: http://webmail.eurecom.fr _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
