Authors, Just a few minor things found while going through the shepherd checklist. These won't block the write-up, but should be fixed before we submit for publication. For now, the write-up will explain that these will be fixed, and I'll clear these comments as soon as an update is posted:
1) Obsolete normative reference: RFC 6536 should be RFC 8341 2) Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis has been published as RFC 8343 3) Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has been published as RFC 8340 4) some artwork has the comment "[note: '\' line wrapping for formatting only]" even when there are no folded lines in the artwork. [hint, only use the ",<column>" version of the INSERT macro for artwork that you know contains a long line, or fix the macro to be smart enough to only insert the header when needed] 5) it is good to see that now the 'reference' statements now follow the "number: title" convention, but many of the "titles" are not the actual title of the referenced draft, as they should be. 6) The document has examples using IPv4 documentation addresses according to RFC6890, but does not use any IPv6 documentation addresses. Maybe there should be IPv6 examples, too? 7) I question if all the normative references are really normative. For instance, RFCs 3688, 5246, 6020, 6241, 6242, 6536, 8040 stand out as not needing to be normative. 8) Section 2, 1st paragraph: s/YANG/YANG 1.1/? Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
