Hi Kent, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Regards, Lisa On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you, Mahesh and Sonal. > > I'm still waiting to hear from Lisa and Dana. Neither have been heard > from since the pen moved a couple years ago. Is anyone aware of Lisa or > Dana's current email? > > Let's give it a few days but, if we don't hear back from them shortly, I > recommend moving their names from authors to contributors so we can unblock > the publishing process. > > Thanks, > Kent // shepherd > > > ===== original message ===== > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of Shepherd write-up for the acl-model draft, we need to ensure > that all IPR has been declared. There was an IPR-call before, when there > was a different set of authors involved, but not since, so it seems prudent > to do another call now. > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > > Please state either: > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > > If yes, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? Please state > either: > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. > > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed > contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S > TO LINES. > > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the > IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware > of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating > in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For > more information, please see the RFCs listed above and > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__trac. > tools.ietf.org_group_iesg_trac_wiki_IntellectualProperty&d=DwICAg& > c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r= > 9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=yj0hQ9S_ > xraeKbiSv7McZY1diBVVR4EU78hnklrI24I&s=xX-ih-MpZ1qkXhYls1UQDAK7WuTJnOc29n7Z > p4nk_Gc&e=. > > Thank you, > > Kent // document shepherd and co-chair > > > PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www. > ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=yj0hQ9S_ > xraeKbiSv7McZY1diBVVR4EU78hnklrI24I&s=m-pbImTlMIVO07ILC0SphA-b3D- > 3urMSOPR3YSWwQXk&e= > > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
