Hi Lada, So you have a base identify of foo-type and subordinates of foo-type-1, foo-type-2, ... foo-type-9. You have a data leaf that type identityref foo-type but the actual instantiation is not one of the known foo-types. Should a foo-type-unknown be defined to return for this case or should one just return foo-type?
Thanks, Acee On 5/3/18, 1:49 PM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Hi Acee, I am not sure what you mean by unknown identities. In general, the identity used as the base of an identityref (or in Xpath functions derived-from/derived-from- or-self) should be the most general identity that can match at the given place. Do you have any example illustrating your case? Lada On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 17:30 +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Let’s say one define a base identity with a hierarchy of identifyref’s using > it. This will allow for augmentation in future models. Should one also define > an identityref for the class of unknown identities? Or, should one simply > return the lowest parent in the hierarchy matching the value? Many times, this > would be the base identity. > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
