On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 05:45:46AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > Hi All, > > Continuing with the below queries. > > 5. For a module like "ietf-netconf-notifications", which implements only > notifications. I think this module is not suitable to be put in any of the > data-stores. So a separate module-set has to be prepared for such modules but > not included in any data-store. Is it correct ?
> 6. Similar logic will apply to any module which only defines "rpc" statements > also I think. Whether need to update the yang-library draft text mentioning > these two scenarios ? RFC 8342 says that the XPath context for notifications, rpc, and actions is the operational state of the server. For actions, RFC 8342 is even more explicit (since they are bound to a data node, which btw can also be true for some notifications): RFC 8342 says that actions are always invoked in the context of the operational state datastore. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
