Hi there,
Reading the text, this errata appears to be correct - the previous
obsoleted versions had separate branches, not the new NMDA based ones.
Authors, would you object to this?
Thank you.
Ignas
On 17/05/2018 05:25, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8342,
"Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5362
--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Rohit R Ranade <[email protected]>
Section: 2
Original Text
-------------
The convention adopted by the interfaces
data model [RFC8343] and the IP data model [RFC8344] was to use two
separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
objects.
Corrected Text
--------------
The convention adopted by the interfaces
data model [RFC7223] and the IP data model [RFC7277] was to use two
separate branches rooted at the root of the data tree: one branch for
configuration data objects and one branch for operational state data
objects.
Notes
-----
The duplication of definition and separation of operational state data and
configuration data happened in RFC7223 and RFC7277. RFC8343 and RFC8344 have
corrected this using NMDA architecture
Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC8342 (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10)
--------------------------------------
Title : Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)
Publication Date : March 2018
Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, P. Shafer, K. Watsen, R.
Wilton
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Network Modeling
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
