Hi Allison, Please see inline:
Thanks, Sonal. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Allison Mankin <[email protected]> wrote: > I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the > document's authors for their information and to allow them to address any > issues raised. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should > consider this review together with any other last-call comments they > receive. Please always CC tsv-art@… if you reply to or forward this > review.. > > Summary: > Almost Ready (but I do have a question) > > Technicals: > I reviewed that the details about TCP, UDP, ECN, and DSCP are consistent > with the specifications, and that the specifications are accurate. The > model is accurate for these. > > > Question: > What is the use case for ACLs referencing TCP PSH and URG flags, and > sequence numbers? These are not very predictable and I would think not > very useful for the work that ACLs do, but I'm willing to be informed. > > [SA] The use case for this would be for applications that use ACL's and > require high levels of security. Enumerating all the supported flags and > their bit positions makes it clear to the user. These flags and the > sequence number are all part of the TCP header. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
