Hi Rob,
Right you are, "refine" doesn't have a "when" substatement, but "augment" does.
grouping "bar-etc" {
uses "foo-bar-etc" {
augment "foo" {
when "false()";
}
}
}
The problem with splitting up groupings is that 1) it needs to be done
beforehand and 2) it may produce "unnatural" groupings that wouldn't be
there otherwise.
Kent
===== original message =====
Hi Kent,
I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
statement, although an equivalent solution would be refine it with an
if-feature statement for a feature that is never enabled.
Ideally, I think that the groupings would be split up, so that they
build on each other.
grouping "foo" {
container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
}
grouping "bar-etc" {
container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
... // the "etc" ;)
}
grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
grouping "foo";
grouping "bar-etc";
}
Thanks,
Rob
On 11/07/2018 18:30, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Say there is:
>
> grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
> container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
> container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
> ... // the "etc" ;)
> }
>
> And the goal is to use the grouping sans the "foo" node.
> Can a "when" statement that always evaluates to "false"
> do it?
>
> grouping "bar-etc" {
> uses "foo-bar-etc" {
> refine "foo" {
> when "false()";
> }
> }
> }
>
> Any better ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Kent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIDaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=n8AUR8gtF330d96dqckvx53hCdyUm5tsTzJsm6DU83U&s=hD50p0RzLVzzTnQ62nxgs256wFf7UmIczTJMf9ym_n8&e=
> .
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
