On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:41:33PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > I strongly object to requirement 3.1: > > > 3.1 The solution MUST provide a mechanism to allow servers to > support existing clients in a backward compatible way. > > > > This is not what servers do today at all. > They provide only one version of an implemented module, as specified in RFC > 7950.
But today a backwards incompatible change leads to a new module and you can very well implement two modules if that is reasonable to do in order to allow clients a transition period. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
