Hi, "Acee Lindem \(acee\)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it possible to indicate that choice statement must be specified > in a YANG 1.1 “must” clause w/o specifying every case?
Do you mean that you to ensure that a case is always configured? If so, mark the choice as "mandatory true". It can't be done with an XPath expression. /martin > Similarly, it is there a way specify that a container cannot be empty in > “must” clause? > Thanks, > Acee _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
