Hi, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This draft is new to me and modelling of alarm management also > somewhat.... > > Could you enlighten me on the relationship, if any, in between the > alarm module of this draft and the > Device/resource alarm state within RFC8348 (equivalently the > EntityAlarmStatus of RFC4268) ?
The "alarm-state" in RFC 8348 (and EntityAlarmStatus in RFC 4268) is just a summary of the alarms that may be active on the specific hardware component. It doesn't say anything about how alarms are reported, and it doesn't provide any details of the alarms; it is just a bitmask. The alarm-module draft OTOH, specifies how alarms are reported, generically. It also provides a list of all active alarms. > E.g. are the two they considered complementary mechanisms (modules), > just different view glasses, or are they non-compatible or redundant > ..? So if both modules are implemented (they don't have to be), the information can be viewed as redundant or just different views. /martin > > Many Thanks in advance ! > > > BR, Karen Nielsen > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
