> On Sep 27, 2018, at 4:14 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alissa/Mahesh,
> 
>> On Sep 26, 2018, at 9:17 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Alissa,
>> 
>>> On Sep 26, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Alissa Cooper <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19: Discuss
>>> 
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html 
>>> <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html>
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/ 
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> DISCUSS:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> We previously had a work item we were tracking with the IEEE leadership 
>>> around
>>> the IEEE writing a YANG module for ethertypes. I just wanted to check that 
>>> the
>>> IEEE is aware that this document is defining a placeholder module for
>>> ethertypes until such time that they define one.
>> 
>> They were told as much in the joint IETF-IEEE meeting.
> 
> There was an IETF-IEEE leadership co-ordination call this afternoon and I 
> reminded the RAC person on the call about this draft and our past 
> interactions with the IEEE. I also send a note to the IETF-IEEE co-ordination 
> group so that any interested persons on the IEEE side will be aware of this 
> draft.
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ieee-ietf-coord/current/msg01134.html 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ieee-ietf-coord/current/msg01134.html>
> 
> So, unless we hear some objections in the near future we are good to go in 
> this regard.

Thank you Suresh, I have cleared my DISCUSS.

Alissa

> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to