Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Rich version of this review at: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D3506 DETAIL S 4. > > It is worth emphasizing that the nodes specified in > "parent-reference" leaf-list are available in the mounted schema only > for XPath evaluations. In particular, they cannot be accessed there > via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or > RESTCONF [RFC8040]. What are the security implications of this XPath reference outside the mount jail? Specifically, how does it interact with the access control for the enclosing module. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
