Either defining a new module in an Appendix or a subtree, I am OK with either and both of us concur that the draft needs the changes.
-----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 17 October 2018 18:18 To: Rohit R Ranade <[email protected]> Cc: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 Obviously, this is now a slightly different statement. There are NMDA transition guidelines that have been discussed at length and finally been integated into https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20#section-4.23.3 This section 4.23.3 says under case (a): Both the NMDA and the non-NMDA modules SHOULD be published in the same document, with NMDA modules in the document main body and the non-NMDA modules in a non-normative appendix. In other words, you do not pollute a new NMDA module with non-NMDA subtrees but instead you create an additional module that goes into an appendix and is only relevant for transition purposes. I think Rob created tools to generate such things. Section 4.23.3.1 also provides some guidelines for creating temporary non NMDA modules. /js On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:22:39PM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > If the server does not yet support NETCONF-NMDA / RESTCONF-NMDA drafts, then > we will need this separate subtree to show the system defined tags. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 17 October 2018 17:22 > To: Rohit R Ranade <[email protected]> > Cc: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [netmod] Review comments for module-tags-02 > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:46:03AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > > I think we need to define a subtree for non-NMDA clients to get the > > operational tags. > > It is not much of a change for a _client_ to read a different datastore hence > I do not think this is needed. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
