This message concludes the successful adoption of draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00.
Authors, please resubmit this draft, unchanged, other than to rename it as draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-00. As is generally the case, this approval signals that the working group is willing to work on the problem, not that the specific solution described in the is itself approved. In particular, the chairs request that the use cases are reexamined in order to determine what format and/or formats are needed and, if more than one, which is the default. Thanks, Kent (and Lou and Joel) -----Original Message----- From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Kent Watsen <[email protected]> Date: Monday, October 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections. This email starts an adoption poll for: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dclemm-2Dnetmod-2Dnmda-2Ddiff-2D00&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=gsKerK-Djok6lTL0A8Sm8PaSJp6FiR0S154Q4ngxing&s=u88P8I81zsimKgBTZg6rJeSJBMR8dk-DshFuuehBkVM&e= Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. If objecting, please state your reasons on this thread. Kent (and Lou and Joel) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=gsKerK-Djok6lTL0A8Sm8PaSJp6FiR0S154Q4ngxing&s=PSOMHRPSVUZHLBlFdhmxWjwRc4VHG45k-vh2cJJjqI8&e= _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
