Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > Tom, > > the IANA registry has this field, I assume it got introduced when IANA > started to maintain their own modules and needed a flag to distinguish > them from other modules. Martin may know more. If you think this is a > problem, the authors can remove 'Maintained by IANA?: N' strictly > following RFC 6020 and IANA will then add this bit later during the > IANA processing.
I don't know more. I will check with IANA. /martin > > /js > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:15:04PM +0000, tom petch wrote: > > draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-10 > > has, in IANA Considerations, > > Name: ietf-microwave-radio-link > > Maintained by IANA?: N > > Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-microwave-radio-link > > Prefix: mrl > > Reference: RFC XXXX > > which adds a line I have not seen before, not mentioned - naturally - in > > RFC6020 or RFC7950 nor does it appear in e.g. RFC8407. > > > > It seems like 'A Good Thing' but where has it come from, what is the > > basis for it and is there a reference for it? It could be construed as > > a breach of RFC6020. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
