I submitted yang-next issue #55 to track the long-term solution. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/55
K. -----Original Message----- From: netmod <[email protected]> on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 10:00 AM To: Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [netmod] xpath expressions in JSON On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 03:42:35PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > I would suggest to extend the definition of the "xpath1.0" type with the > > corresponding specification of the default XPath context. > > Yes, something for 6991bis. > > Meanwhile, for SN, we can add this already there for stream-xpath-filter. I am not sure whether a new type definition is needed or just some clarification of the current xpath1.0 definition. Perhaps a new definition plus deprecation of the xpath1.0 definition is the right thing to do. I have added this to my list of possible changes to RFC 6991. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jacobs-2Duniversity.de_&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=OYG_fxffwCJOWueATMe9b73VMEAPJoZW-LckDCww-zQ&s=h4I_afqQxv59YjCpmQoMSMEaFSCINuosp84DTFIgYS8&e=> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=OYG_fxffwCJOWueATMe9b73VMEAPJoZW-LckDCww-zQ&s=bNpVmLtw6crkmxB3FFeBC8GcqN3CcJ92ug2_hCFD3j0&e= _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
