Hi Qin,
On 11/1/18, 10:44 AM, "Qin Wu" <[email protected]> wrote:
That's a good use case for geo-location service. If the geo-location
information is specified in routing protocol, I think it should also be
specified by YANG, but need to make sure they are consistent.
For precision of longitude and latitude, why not use DMS (Degree, Minute,
Second)?
I'd be happy to reach consensus on this but we're going to solve it in this
Email thread.
Thanks,
Acee
-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2018年11月1日 22:18
收件人: Qin Wu <[email protected]>; Juergen Schoenwaelder
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
主题: Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis
Hi Qin,
We'd tried to converge on geo-coordinates in the protocols and received and
a rather wide range of opinions as to the precision and what was required. An
IETF consensus is required and not everyone is going to be happy. However, I'm
not sure where this work lies and it hasn't been a priority for me. In fact, I
let my draft expire:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-acee-ospf-geo-location-05.txt. I think
trying to adding these before this happens could delay the BIS update.
Thanks,
Acee
On 11/1/18, 7:55 AM, "netmod on behalf of Qin Wu" <[email protected]
on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
I am wondering if we can add longitude, latitude in DMS or decimal
degree,
Further we can consider to add
Postal-code, Country-code like Location type.
-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder
发送时间: 2018年10月31日 20:47
收件人: [email protected]
主题: Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis
Here is my list of possible additions. I might have lost some items on
a computer that meanwhile is not used anymore, I will have to dig a bit to see
what I can recover.
/js
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:26:01PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another update that was discussed recently is a clarification of the
> XPath context for the xpath1.0 type.
>
> Lada
>
> Kent Watsen <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > NETMOD WG,
> >
> > A conversation in NETCONF WG regarding the yang-push noted that it
> > might be time to update RFC 6991, in particular to introduce a type
for time-duration.
> >
> >
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/KaUJloIShkLNIXTuHZNwB-
> > SYBnQ
> >
> > In addition, it might be good to introduce [inet?] types for RFC
> > 5322 (Internet Message Format) including perhaps:
> >
> > - email-address (addr-spec, per Section 3.4.1)
> > - named-email-address (name-addr, per Section 3.4)
> >
> >
> > Kent // contributor
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka
> Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
