Hi Rohit,
Are you familiar with either of the LNE or NI model drafts?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/
I believe both of these drafts were driving some of the key schema mount
requirements, and may provide useful examples of the use cases.
On 21/12/2018 12:01, Rohit R Ranade wrote:
Hi All,
+--ro mount-point* [module label]
+--ro module yang:yang-identifier
+--ro label yang:yang-identifier
+--ro *config*? boolean
1..When reading the schema mount draft it is not clear for which
use-case, the “config” being false will be helpful for ?
Section 3 of the LNE draft writes about the use of this config leaf.
2..If there are modules with config true nodes mounted, how can the
data-nodes of those mounted modules be instantiated if the config leaf
is false ?
There will likely be separate direct YANG management protocol access to
the mounted data (e.g. for a mounted LNE) that would allow the
configuration to be manipulated.
Thanks,
Rob
With Regards,
Rohit
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
