Hi Rohit, Rohit R Ranade <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi All, > > module: ietf-yang-schema-mount > +--ro schema-mounts > +--ro namespace* [prefix] > | +--ro prefix yang:yang-identifier > | +--ro uri? inet:uri > +--ro mount-point* [module label] > +--ro module yang:yang-identifier > +--ro label yang:yang-identifier > +--ro config? boolean > +--ro (schema-ref) > +--:(inline) > | +--ro inline! > +--:(shared-schema) > +--ro shared-schema! > +--ro parent-reference* yang:xpath1.0 > > Any reason for not adding "parent-reference" for "inline" type ? What > is the solution for the modules defined under such mount points to > refer to parent schema ? The inline case was intentionally designed with an impenetrable "mount jail". Do you see any use case where parent references are needed and the "shared-schema" strategy cannot be used? Lada > > With Regards, > Rohit > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
