Joe,

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Joe Clarke
发送时间: 2019年3月25日 22:14
收件人: [email protected]
主题: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

I support the need for being able to reset a DS to its factory default.
However, I have a question on the current design of the model and the 
"factory-default" DS.

It seems to me that this is a single DS that might have been intended to reset 
running or startup.  However, what if I have different DSes that each have 
unique factory default data? 

[Qin]:We start with a simple case, you case could be addressed by invoking 
multiple rpc with each rpc to allow reset a set of datastores.
 If I choose to extend factory-default with a new identity of my other DS, how 
can I indicate that the target DS will be reset to _that_ DS?  Does that make 
sense?

[Qin]: In simple case, target DS will only be reset by a single factory 
datastore. If there is a new factory datastore could be derived from that DS, I 
think target DS should be changed to reset that new factory datastore.

Or if I do a <get-data> on a factory-default DS, how do I know what other DSes 
does this DS pertain?  Perhaps the server will use this to reset a given DS, 
but how would a user know that (other than perhaps naming of the 
factory-default DS)?

Maybe the module needs a mapping to let the client know what DS will be used to 
reset what other DS?
[Qin]: So your point is should we allow multiple source, multiple target in the 
same RPC, will think it over. Thanks.
Joe

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to